Attentional Style, Linguistic Complexity and
the Treatment of Reading Difficulty
Unpublished PhD thesis. University of
Aston in Birmingham (1978)
E Neville Brown
Abstract
Part One. Early or "apprentice" reading is widely assumed
to necessitate phonological encoding as mediational between the
printed stimulus and meaning. Mature reading appears to be able
to avoid chronological encoding, proceeding directly to meaning.
In order to determine preference for encoding modality, 149 "apprentice"
readers were subjected in separate conditions to auditory-phonological
and visuo-graphic interference of possible meaningfulness whilst
reading prose passages. Subjects preferring the visual modality
had a greater reading difficulty than subjects showing preference
for auditory processing, was subjects who showed no distinct preference
for either tended to be better readers.
Part Two. Prose passages of graded difficulty were analysed in terms
of word-origin or mode of generation, number of morphographemes,
and congruence syllabic/morphographemic segmentation. All three
variables were significantly correlated with age norm levels for
word-recognition and comprehension for the passages. The results
were taken to suggest an alternative basis for a readability index
whereby prose materials could be assigned to levels of difficulty
for "apprentice" readers.
Part Three. To investigate the modified model of the reading process,
a corpus of the words of a predictably high level of difficulty
was derived according to the findings of Part 2. Children with "specific
reading difficulty" were told to recognise and understand the
words by (a) a specially-devised unimodal, visual method and (b)
a "normal", bimodal, phonics method. The results of the
application of a comprehension test suggested the superiority of
the unimodal method over the bimodal. Within the unimodal group,
visual-preferents performed significantly better than auditory-preferents,
but auditory-preferents in the unimodal group performed significantly
better than auditory-preferents in the group taught by the bimodal
method. The results were taken to suggest the usefulness of the
modified model of reading automaticity, whereby the direct grapheme-to-meaning
path is possible for "apprentice" readers, in the treatment
of "specific reading difficulty". The implications of
the findings for the treatment of other communication difficulties
were also discussed.
|